Showing posts with label Social Post. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social Post. Show all posts

Sunday, July 16, 2017

Take legal action against Blackmailers (for girsl)




Recently something really diabolical and terrible happened and now I feel compelled to spread as much awareness as I can regarding the sensitive and elusive issue of "HOW GUYS BLACKMAIL GIRLS AND HOW TO HANDLE SUCH A PREDICAMENT" because this page is comprised of well educated and decent people and its like a family. KINDLY READ IT THOROUGHLY AS I HAVE TYPED ALL THIS JUST SO NO ONE ELSE SUFFERS.
..........
So recently I came across a really sad and agonizing incident where a really talented and graceful girl belonging to a very respectable family got blackmailed by a guy who had her private pictures and forced her to give him money and fulfill his feral lust. In the end she committed suicide thinking that she has no other option. YOU ALWAYS HAVE AN OPTION and today I am going to discuss how to utilize it.
..........
So here it goes:
1. First of all do not send or show anyone and I mean ANYONE your private picture no matter how sure you are and no matter how much of that so called 'TRUST' is there.
2. Secondly if somehow your pictures end up with someone and he starts blackmailing you that he will spread your pictures through a fake profile. Now anyone in this situation would freak out but DON'T.
3. Simply tell him go on do it and also tell him that you have all his details and you are going to file an OFFICIAL COMPLAINT with the "FIA National Response Center for Cyber Crimes(NR3C)" who will track him down and throw his sorry self in jail for a long long time under Electronic Transaction Ordinance. Also tell him that you have lawyers who know how how to deal with people like you and make sure that even if you submit a bail application after your arrest, it gets denied by the court so just try me. REMEMBER YOU CANNOT SHOW ANY SIGN OF FEAR. GO FULL ON BOLD AT HIM.
4. After you have conveyed this to him, simply write down your application (in English or in Urdu), narrate your complete problem, provide as much evidences, details as you can and send it to FIA National Response Center for Cyber Crimes(NR3C).
Address this application to,
To Director Cyber Crimes,
FIA Heaquarters, Islamabad
Write down your problem, with complete details… and in the end mention your name, contact numbers and addresses.
Fax: 051-9266435
Email: helpdesk@nr3c.gov.pk
5. Once you have done that, before sending the application you should show this application to that sad animal who is blackmailing you and tell him that if you want to go down this road, you will cry when you see how it ends for you. Try to end the matter there and then in order to avoid publication of the matter but if he refuses, send the application without any delay.
6. Moreover you also need to take your family in confidence because they are the only ones who are your best chance against such a situation. Go and tell you mother or elder sister or whomever you are most frank with and they will help you break the ice with others.
7. Lastly remember THE LAW IS THERE TO PROTECT YOU, all you need to do is to be aware of it. Do not be scared, do not think that this is the end, do not give him any money, do not do anything he asks and if you steel your nerves you can overcome this.
THIS ISSUE SEEMS SO BIG BUT TRUST ME IT LIKE PEANUTS IF YOU KNOW WHAT TO DO.
I hope my message reaches as far as is possible and I hope it helps creating awareness.

Friday, July 7, 2017

Pakistan Railways Crises

Pakistan Railways is a national transport service. It provides an important mode of transportation in the farthest corners of the country and brings them closer for business, sight-seeing, pilgrimage and education. Railway has been a cheapest mode of transportation for passengers and goods.  It is under the administration of federal government and its head quarter is in Lahore.
The domestic road transportation system was not well developed at the time of independence. Railways were the main means of transportation. In the 1970s and 1980s road and air networks grew considerably faster than did the railways.
Pakistan Railways is an important source of transportation throughout the country which helps in growth of economy for the country.
But now Pakistan Railway is facing a number of problems due to mismanagement, poor maintenance and shortage of locomotives, fuel and money. The available locomotives are in poor condition therefore trains breakdown in the mid-way and people have to wait for a long time for repairing or replacement of the faulty engine.
A number of train routes of Pakistan Railways have been cancelled and many more will be suspended in near future. Mostly trains are too late and passengers have to wait for a long time therefore passengers are not sure that at which time they will reach to their destination.
The trains are in a worst condition and passengers have to suffer because of lack of facilities of lights and fans. Seats are also in a poor condition. The ticket checkers are also too lazy and they do not perform their duties well.
The platforms are mostly full of people, frustrated and disowned by the Pakistan Railway but not even a single railway official bother to meet these people and to care about their problems.
Pakistan Railways need to improve locomotives and availability of fuel. Pakistan Railway should reduce the trains’ fare to provide convenience to the public. If Pakistan Railway fails to improve its services, the country will move towards financially bankruptcy. Pakistan Railway needs to improve the trains’ conditions and to provide facilities in the trains as well as at the platforms.
I hope these problems would be solved and people again would prefer to travel by trains.

Thursday, July 6, 2017

میری بیٹی میرا غرور ہے

(میری بیٹی میرا غرور ہے )
کچھ دن پہلے اسکے موبائل پر انجانے نمبر سے کال آنے لگی. اس نے یہ سوچ کر کہ کسی دوست یا جاننے والی کی کال ہوگی, کال ریسیو کرلی. مگر دوسری طرف سے مردانہ آواز سنتے ہی رانگ نمبر کہہ کر کال منقطع کردی. بس وہ دن ہے اور آج کا دن میسجز اور کالز کا ایسا تانتا بندھا جو رکنے کا نام ہی نہ لیتا.
کال تو اس نے کوئی رسیو نہ کی مگر میسجز پڑھتی رہی. نام پوچھا جاتا، فون اٹھانے پر اصرار کیا جاتا اور اسکی آواز کی خوب تعریف کی جاتی، اپنے بارے میں بتایا جاتا،
جواب نہ دینے کے باوجود میسجز اور کالز کا سلسلہ مستقل مزاجی سے جاری تھا.
#عِفّت کے لیے یہ سب نیا تھا، چھوٹی سی عمر کا ایک انجانا سا احساس تھا جسے وہ خود سمجھنے سے قاصر تھی.
کیا ہوا اگر میں بھی ایک میسج کردوں یہی پوچھ لیتی ہوں کہ کون ہو اور کیوں مجھے تنگ کررہے ہو، اس لمحے اسکے دماغ میں خیال آیا. رات کے تین بج رہے تھے. کتنی ہی بار اس نے میسج لکھ کر مٹایا, عجیب شش و پنج کا شکار تھی. کوئی اس سے بات کرنے کے لیۓ بےچین تھا، یہ خیال اسے نہ جانے کیوں ایک انجانی سی خوشی دے رہا تھا.
بالآخر سوچ بچار کے بعد اس نے ایک میسج ٹائپ کرلیا. جس میں اس نے لکھا کہ وہ کون ہے اور رات کے اس پہر اسے کیوں تنگ کررہا ہے. ہاں کوئی بات نہیں ایک میسج ہی تو ہے اور پوچھ لینے میں قباحت ہی کیا ہے, اس نے خود کو تسلی دی.
بٹن دبانے ہی لگی تھی کہ اچانک اک چہرہ اسکی دماغ کی اسکرین پر ابھرا.
"میری بیٹی تو میرا مان ہے"
یہ جملہ جو اسکے بابا اس کا ماتھا چومتے ہوۓ اکثر دہرایا کرتے تھے. اس کے حلق میں کانٹے چبھنے لگے.
"بیٹیاں جب معاشرے میں سر جھکا کر چلتی ہیں تب ہی اس کےبھائی اور باپ سر اٹھا کر چلنے کے قابل ہوتے ہیں"
شفقت و محبت سے کہا گیا بابا کا ایک اور جملہ دل کی تار چھیڑ گیا.
جب کبھی امی جی بابا کو اسے سر چڑھانے کا طعنہ دیتیں تو بابا کی طرف سے ایک مخصوص جواب آتا کہ
"عِفّت تو اپنے بابا کا غرور ہے"
اور ہمیشہ ہی اسے یہ جملہ سرشار کر دیتا.
اسے اپنا سارا وجود سن ہوتا ہوا محسوس ہوا، بڑی مشکل سے بستر سے اٹھی. پسینے سے شرابور لڑکھڑاتے قدموں کے ساتھ بالکونی میں جا کھڑی ہوئی.
"میری بیٹی تو میرا غرور ہے"
"میری بیٹی تو میرا مان ہے"
"میری بیٹی بہت بہادر ہے"
کانوں میں گونجتی بابا کی آواز اب تک سنائی دے رہی تھیں.
جی بابا جانی میں کمزور نہیں ہوں, آپکی عِفّت آپکا غرور نہیں توڑے گی ان شاءاللہ.
آپکا سر کبھی جھکنے نہیں دے گی، آپکا یہ مان ہمیشہ قائم رکھے گی. آپ کی دی گئی محبت کا ناجائز فائدہ نہیں اٹھاۓ گی.
وہ سرگوشی میں بولتی گئی، آنسو اسکے گالوں کو بھگو رہے تھے.
اس نے جلدی سے اس نمبر کو بلاک کیا. سکون کے احساس کے ساتھ اس نے گہرا سانس لیا اور آسمان کی جانب دیکھنے لگی رات کی آخری پہر تھی کچھ دیر میں سحر ہونے کو تھی.
نیچے صحن کی طرف دیکھا تو بابا تہجد پڑھنے کے بعد اللہ رب العزت کے سامنے ہاتھ پھیلاۓ دعا مانگنے میں مصروف نظر آۓ.
باپ اللہ سے اسکی عزت و آبرو کی دعا مانگیں اور اللہ پاک اسے گناہوں کی دلدل سے نہ بچائیں ایسا کیسے ہوسکتا تھا.
اسے اس لمحے اپنے بابا پر بےحد پیار آیا. انکی صحت و سلامتی کی دعا کرتی وہ وضو کے لیۓ اٹھ کھڑی ہوئی.
انجان نمبروں کے ذریعے پھینکا ہوا یہ شیطان کا جال ہوتا ہے جو وہ صنف نازک پر پھینکتا ہے, ایک جگہ سے نشانہ چھوٹ جاۓ تو دوسری جگہ آزماتا ہے اور جہاں نشانہ لگ گیا رسوائی و پچھتاوا لڑکی کے حصے میں ہی آتی ہے.
قابل تعریف ہیں وہ لڑکیاں جو ان جالوں سے اپنی اور اپنے سے وابستہ رشتوں کی ناموس کو بچالیتی ہیں اور اپنے والدین کا مان ٹوٹنے نہیں دیتیں.
اللّٰہ پاک تمام بہن بیٹیوں کی حفاظت فرمائے آمین۔

Lewinsky Scandal

Search
Lewinsky scandal
The Lewinsky scandal was an American political sex scandal that involved 49-year-old President Bill Clinton and a 22-year-old White House intern, Monica Lewinsky. The sexual relationship took place between 1995 and 1996 and came to light in 1998. Clinton ended a televised speech with the statement that he did not have sexual relations with Lewinsky. Further investigation led to charges of perjuryand led to the impeachment of President Clinton in 1998 by the U.S. House of Representatives and his subsequent acquittal on all impeachment charges of perjury and obstruction of justice in a 21-day Senate trial.[1] Clinton was held in civil contempt of court by Judge Susan Webber Wright for giving misleading testimony in the Paula Jones case regarding Lewinsky[2] and was also fined $90,000 by Wright.[3] His license to practice law was suspended in Arkansas for five years; shortly thereafter, he was disbarred from presenting cases in front of the United States Supreme Court.[4]
During Clinton's first term in 1995, Lewinsky—a graduate of Lewis & Clark College—was hired to work as an intern at the White House and was later an employee of the White House Office of Legislative Affairs. While Lewinsky worked at the White House, Clinton began a personal relationship with her, the details of which she later confided to Linda Tripp, her Defense Department co-worker who secretly recorded their telephone conversations.[5]
In January 1998, Tripp discovered that Lewinsky had sworn an affidavit in the Paula Jones case, denying a relationship with Clinton. She delivered tapes to Kenneth Starr, the Independent Counsel who was investigating Clinton on other matters, including the Whitewater scandal, the White House FBI files controversy, and the White House travel office controversy. During the grand jury testimony, Clinton's responses were carefully worded, and he argued, "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is,"[6] with regard to the truthfulness of his statement that "there is not a sexual relationship, an improper sexual relationship or any other kind of improper relationship."[7]
The wide reporting of the scandal led to criticism of the press for over-coverage.[8][9][10] The scandal is sometimes referred to as "Monicagate,"[11] Lewinskygate,"[12] "Tailgate,"[13] "Sexgate,"[14] and "Zippergate,"[14] following the "-gate" nickname construction that has been popular since the Watergate scandal.
The improper relationship between Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinskywas confirmed, but Clinton's marriage with his wife, Hillary Clinton, survived the scandal.
Allegations of sexual contactEdit
Lewinsky stated that she had sexual encounters with Bill Clinton on nine occasions from November 1995 to March 1997. According to her published schedule, First Lady Hillary Clinton was at the White House for at least some portion of seven of those days.[15]
In April 1996, Lewinsky's superiors relocated her job to the Pentagon, because they felt that she was spending too much time around Clinton.[16] According to his autobiography, then-United Nations Ambassador Bill Richardson was asked by the White House in 1997 to interview Lewinsky for a job on his staff at the UN. Richardson did so, and offered her a position, which she declined.[17] The American Spectator alleged that Richardson knew more about the Lewinsky affair than he declared to the grand jury.[18]
Lewinsky confided in Linda Tripp about her relationship with Clinton. Tripp persuaded Lewinsky to save the gifts that Clinton had given her, and not to dry clean a semen-stained blue dress. Tripp reported their conversations to literary agent Lucianne Goldberg, who advised her to secretly record them,[19] which Tripp began doing in September 1997. Goldberg also urged Tripp to take the tapes to Independent CounselKenneth Starr and bring them to the attention of people working on the Paula Jones case.[20] In the fall of 1997, Goldberg began speaking to reporters (notably Michael Isikoff of Newsweek) about the tapes.[21]
In the Paula Jones case, Lewinsky had submitted an affidavit that denied any physical relationship with Clinton. In January 1998, she attempted to persuade Tripp to commit perjury in the Jones case. Instead, Tripp gave the tapes to Starr, who was investigating the Whitewater controversy and other matters. Starr was now armed with evidence of Lewinsky's admission of a physical relationship with Clinton, and he broadened the investigation to include Lewinsky and her possible perjury in the Jones case.
Denial and subsequent admissionEdit
Bill Clinton making a presentation that ends with a short commentary on the Monica Lewinsky scandal. The presentation is known for the quote "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky." (6:20)
audio only version
Problems playing these files? See media help.
News of the scandal first broke on January 17, 1998, on the Drudge Report,[22] which reported that Newsweek editors were sitting on a story by investigative reporter Michael Isikoff exposing the affair. The story broke in the mainstream press on January 21 in The Washington Post.[23] The story swirled for several days and, despite swift denials from Clinton, the clamor for answers from the White House grew louder. On January 26, President Clinton, standing with his wife, spoke at a White House press conference, and issued a forceful denial in which he said:[24]
Now, I have to go back to work on my State of the Union speech. And I worked on it until pretty late last night. But I want to say one thing to the American people. I want you to listen to me. I'm going to say this again: I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky. I never told anybody to lie, not a single time; never. These allegations are false. And I need to go back to work for the American people. Thank you.[25]

Pundits debated whether Clinton would address the allegations in his State of the Union Address. Ultimately, he chose not to mention them. Hillary Clinton remained supportive of her husband throughout the scandal. On January 27, in an appearance on NBC's Today she said, "The great story here for anybody willing to find it and write about it and explain it is this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president."
For the next several months and through the summer, the media debated whether an affair had occurred and whether Clinton had lied or obstructed justice, but nothing could be definitively established beyond the taped recordings because Lewinsky was unwilling to discuss the affair or testify about it. On July 28, 1998, a substantial delay after the public break of the scandal, Lewinsky received transactional immunity in exchange for grand jury testimony concerning her relationship with Clinton.[26] She also turned over a semen-stained blue dress (that Linda Tripp had encouraged her to save without dry cleaning) to the Starr investigators, thereby providing unambiguous DNA evidence that could prove the relationship despite Clinton's official denials.[27]
Clinton admitted in taped grand jury testimony on August 17, 1998, that he had engaged in an "improper physical relationship" with Lewinsky. That evening he gave a nationally televised statement admitting that his relationship with Lewinsky was "not appropriate".[28]
Perjury chargesEdit
In his deposition for the Jones lawsuit, Clinton denied having sexual relations with Lewinsky. Based on the evidence—a blue dress with Clinton's semen that Tripp provided—Starr concluded that the president's sworn testimony was false and perjurious.
During the deposition, Clinton was asked "Have you ever had sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky, as that term is defined in Deposition Exhibit 1?" The judge ordered that Clinton be given an opportunity to review the agreed definition. Afterwards, based on the definition created by the Independent Counsel's Office, Clinton answered, "I have never had sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky." Clinton later stated, "I thought the definition included any activity by [me], where [I] was the actor and came in contact with those parts of the bodies" which had been explicitly listed (and "with an intent to gratify or arouse the sexual desire of any person"). In other words, Clinton denied that he had ever contacted Lewinsky's "genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks", and effectively claimed that the agreed-upon definition of "sexual relations" included giving oral sex but excluded receiving oral sex.[29]
Two months after the Senate failed to convict him, President Clinton was held in civil contempt of court by Judge Susan Webber Wright for giving misleading testimony regarding his sexual relationship with Lewinsky, and was also fined $90,000 by Wright.[2][3] Clinton declined to appeal the civil contempt of court ruling, citing financial problems,[2]but still maintained that his testimony complied with Wright's earlier definition of sexual relations.[2] In 2001, his license to practice law was suspended in Arkansas for five years and later by the United States Supreme Court.[4]
ImpeachmentEdit
In December 1998, Clinton's Democratic political party was in the minority in both chambers of Congress. A few Democratic members of Congress, and most in the opposition Republican Party, claimed that Clinton's giving false testimony and allegedly influencing Lewinsky's testimony were crimes of obstruction of justice and perjury and thus impeachable offenses. The House of Representatives voted to issue Articles of Impeachment against him which was followed by a 21-day trial in the Senate.
All of the Democrats in the Senate voted for acquittal on both the perjury and the obstruction of justice charges. Ten Republicans voted for acquittal for perjury: John Chafee (Rhode Island), Susan Collins(Maine), Slade Gorton (Washington), Jim Jeffords (Vermont), Richard Shelby (Alabama), Olympia Snowe (Maine), Arlen Specter(Pennsylvania), Ted Stevens (Alaska), Fred Thompson (Tennessee), and John Warner (Virginia). Five Republicans voted for acquittal for obstruction of justice: Chafee, Collins, Jeffords, Snowe, and Specter.
President Clinton was thereby acquitted of all charges and remained in office. There were attempts to censure the president by the House of Representatives, but those attempts failed.
AftermathEdit
Clinton and Lewinsky on a 1998 Abkhazia stamp
Effect on 2000 presidential electionEdit
The scandal arguably affected the 2000 U.S. presidential election in two contradictory ways. Democratic Party candidate and sitting vice president Al Gore said that Clinton's scandal had been "a drag" that deflated the enthusiasm of their party's base, and had the effect of reducing Democratic votes. Clinton said that the scandal had made Gore's campaign too cautious, and that if Clinton had been allowed to campaign for Gore in Arkansas and New Hampshire, either state would have delivered Gore's needed electoral votes regardless of the effects of the Florida recount controversy.[30]
Political analysts have supported both views. Before and after the 2000 election, John Cochran of ABC News connected the Lewinsky scandal with a voter phenomenon he called "Clinton fatigue".[31]Polling showed that the scandal continued to affect Clinton's low personal approval ratings through the election,[32] and analysts such as Vanderbilt University's John G. Geer later concluded "Clinton fatigue or a kind of moral retrospective voting had a significant impact on Gore's chances".[33] Other analysts sided with Clinton's argument, and argued that Gore's refusal to have Clinton campaign with him damaged his appeal.[34][35][36][37]
Collateral scandalsEdit
During the scandal, supporters of former President Clinton alleged that the matter was private and "about sex", and they claimed hypocrisy by at least some of those who advocated for his removal. For example, during the House investigation it was revealed that Henry Hyde, Republican chair of the House Judiciary Committee and lead House manager, also had an affair while in office as a state legislator. Hyde, aged 70 during the Lewinsky hearings, dismissed it as a "youthful indiscretion" when he was 41.[38]
A highly publicized investigation campaign actively sought information that might embarrass politicians who supported impeachment. According to the British newspaper The Guardian,
Larry Flynt...the publisher of Hustler magazine, offered a $1 million reward... Flynt was a sworn enemy of the Republican party [and] sought to dig up dirt on the Republican members of Congress who were leading the impeachment campaign against President Clinton.
[...Although] Flynt claimed at the time to have the goods on up to a dozen prominent Republicans, the ad campaign helped to bring down only one. Robert Livingston – a congressman from Louisiana...abruptly retired after learning that Mr. Flynt was about to reveal that he had also had an affair.[39]

Republican congressman Bob Livingston had been widely expected to become Speaker of the United States House of Representatives in the next Congressional session.[40] Then just weeks away after Flynt revealed the affair, Livingston resigned and challenged Clinton to do the same.
Following Livingston’s resignation, Dennis Hastert, Republican Representative from Illinois, gained the support of the Republican leadership to seek the speakership as Livingston's successor. He began serving as Speaker in January 1999, and held that role while the Senate conducted the impeachment trial.
On April 27, 2016, former Speaker Hastert was sentenced to 15 months in federal prison for structuring $1.7 million in payments to cover up allegations of sexual misconduct he had made, in which federal prosecutors have said he had molested at least four boys as young as 14 while he worked as a high school wrestling coach decades earlier.[41] At the sentencing hearing during the trial, Hastert admitted under pressure from the judge that he had sexually abused boys. The judge in the case referred to Hastert as a "serial child molester", and alongside imposing a sentence of fifteen months in prison, he also charged him with two years' supervised release, and a $250,000 fine.[42][43] Hastert is "one of the highest-ranking politicians in American history to be sentenced to prison."[42]
Flynt's investigation also claimed that Congressman Bob Barr, another Republican House manager, had an affair while married; Barr had been the first lawmaker in either chamber to call for Clinton's resignation due to the Lewinsky affair. Barr lost a primary challenge less than three years after the impeachment proceedings.[44]
Dan Burton, Republican Representative from Indiana, had stated "No one, regardless of what party they serve, no one, regardless of what branch of government they serve, should be allowed to get away with these alleged sexual improprieties...."[45] In 1998, Burton admitted that he himself had had an affair in 1983 that produced a child.[46]
Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, Representative from Georgia and leader of the Republican Revolution of 1994,[47] admitted in 1998 to having had an affair with a House intern while he was married to his second wife, at the same time as he was leading the impeachment of Bill Clinton for perjury regarding an affair with intern Monica Lewinsky.[48][49]
Republican Helen Chenoweth-Hage from Idaho aggressively called for the resignation of President Clinton and admitted to her own six-year affair with a married rancher during the 1980s.[50]
Personal acceptanceEdit
Historian Taylor Branch implied that Clinton had requested changes to Branch's 2009 Clinton biography, The Clinton Tapes: Wrestling History with the President, regarding Clinton's revelation that the Lewinsky affair began because "I cracked; I just cracked." Branch writes that Clinton had felt "beleaguered, unappreciated, and open to a liaison with Lewinsky" following "the Democrats' loss of Congress in the November 1994 elections, the death of his mother the previous January, and the ongoing Whitewater investigation".[51] Publicly, Clinton had previously blamed the affair on "a terrible moral error" and on anger at Republicans, stating, "if people have unresolved anger, it makes them do non-rational, destructive things."[52]
See alsoEdit
ReferencesEdit
^ Posner, Richard A, (2009). "Introduction". An Affair of State The Investigation, Impeachment, and Trial of President Clinton. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-00080-3. Retrieved March 1, 2012.^ a b c d Broder, John M.; Lewis, Neil A. (April 13, 1999). "Clinton is found to be in contempt on Jones lawsuit". The New York Times. p. 1. Retrieved March 5, 2012.^ a b Jackson, Robert L. (July 30, 1999). "Clinton Fined $90,686 for Lying in Paula Jones Case". Los Angeles Times.^ a b Gearan, Anne (1 October 2001). "Clinton Disbarred From Practice Before Supreme Court". The New York Times. Associated Press.^ "Tripp: I Am Not Intimidated". CBS. July 7, 1998. Retrieved January 26, 2010. In January, Tripp gave Starr the tapes. She made the recordings secretly at her home at the urging of her friend Lucianne Goldberg, a New York literary agent.^ Noah, Timothy (September 13, 1998). "Bill Clinton and the Meaning of "Is"". Slate. Retrieved July 15, 2009.^ President Bill Clinton, The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, 21 January 1998.^ Gitlin, Todd. "The Clinton-Lewinsky Obsession: How the press made a scandal of itself". The Washington Monthly. Retrieved June 11, 2009.^ Kalb, Marvin (September 2001). One Scandalous Story: Clinton, Lewinsky, and Thirteen Days That Tarnished American Journalism. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-85939-4.^ Layton, Lyndsey (July 27, 2004). "The Frenzy Over Lewinsky: As the Scandal Unfolded, a Media Storm Swirled in Washington". The Washington Post. p. B04. Retrieved June 11, 2009.^ Rich, Frank. "Journal; Monicagate Year Two", The New York Times, 16 December 1998.^ Rich, Frank. "Journal; Days of the Locust", The New York Times, February 25, 1998.^ Hennenberger, Melinda. "The President Under Fire", The New York Times, January 29, 1998.^ a b James Barron with Hoban, Phoebe. "Dueling Soaps", The New York Times, January 28, 1998.^ "Lewinsky and the first lady". USA Today. Associated Press. March 19, 2008. Retrieved January 19, 2010.^ Jeff Leen (January 24, 1998). "Lewinsky: Two Coasts, Two Lives, Many Images", The Washington Post.^ Irvine, Reed; Kincaid, Cliff (August 21, 1998). "Bill Richardson Caught In Clinton Undertow". Accuracy in Media. Retrieved March 5,2012.^ York, Byron (November 15, 1998). "The American Spectator : Slick Billy". American Spectator. Retrieved March 5, 2012.^ US News and World Report, "The Monica Lewinsky Tapes", 2 February 1998, v.124 n.4 p.23.^ Thomas, Evan; Isikoff, Michael (November 9, 1998). "The Goldberg-Tripp-Jones Axis". Newsweek. Archived from the originalon June 25, 2009.^ Cloud, John; Barnes, Edward; Zoglin, Richard (February 2, 1998). "Lucianne Goldberg: in pursuit of Clinton". Time.^ "Newsweek Kills Story On White House Intern", DrudgeReportArchives, 1998.^ Schmidt, Susan; Peter Baker; Toni Locy (January 21, 1998). "Special Report: Clinton Accused". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 26, 2010.^ Top 5: Political Quotes That Defined Presidencies, APOLITICUS.COM Archived December 7, 2008, at the Wayback Machine.^ Clinton, Bill. Response to the Lewinsky Allegations, Miller Center of Public Affairs, 26 January 1998.^ Blitzer, Wolf; Franken, Bob (July 28, 1998). "Lewinsky Strikes Far-Reaching Immunity Deal". CNN. Retrieved 9 March 2013.^ "Starr Report". The Washington Post. September 15, 1998. Retrieved 9 May 2013.^ Clinton, Bill. Address to the nation, PBS.org, 17 August 1998.^ Tiersma, Peter. "The Language of Perjury", languageandlaw.org, 20 November 2007.^ Montopoli, Brian (21 September 2009). "Bill Clinton on Lewinsky Affair: 'I Cracked'". Political Hotsheet. CBS News. Retrieved 21 September 2009.^ Dover, Edwin D. (2002). Missed opportunity: Gore, incumbency and television in election 2000. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 130. ISBN 978-0-275-97638-5. John Cochran on ABC described this phenomenon as "Clinton fatigue." He said voters were happy with the policy agenda and direction of the country but were tired of Clinton and wanted to forget him. Casting their votes for Bush and not for Clinton's surrogate, Gore, was one way to bring about this preferred change, Cochran concluded.^ Denton, Robert E. Jr. (2002). The 2000 Presidential Campaign: A Communication Perspective. Volume 2000, Part 3. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 92, 98. ISBN 978-0-275-97107-6.^ Geer, John Gray (2004). Public opinion and polling around the world: a historical encyclopedia. 1. ABC-CLIO. p. 138. ISBN 978-1-57607-911-9.^ Marable, Manning (Summer 2001). "Gore's Defeat: Don't Blame Nader". Synthesis/Regeneration (25). Retrieved 9 May 2013.^ Weisberg, Jacob (8 November 2000). "Why Gore (Probably) Lost". Slate. Retrieved 9 May 2013.^ An anatomy of 2000 USA presidential election, NigerDeltaCongress.com^ Beyond the Recounts: Trends in the 2000 US Presidential Election, Cairn.info^ Talbot, David. "This hypocrite broke up my family", Salon, 16 September 1998.^ Goldenberg, Suzanne. "Porn king offers $1m for US political sex scandal" The Guardian, London. Retrieved September 21, 2009.^ "Robert Livingston, The Heir Apparent With a Black Belt". The New York Times, 10 November 1998, p. A24. Retrieved September 21, 2009.^ Monica Davey & Mitch Smith, Hastert Molested at Least Four Boys, Prosecutors Say, New York Times (April 8, 2016).^ a b Associated Press, The Latest: Dennis Hastert Sentenced to 15 Months in Prison (April 27, 2016).^ Davey, Monica; Bosman, Julie; Smith, Mitch (April 28, 2016). "Dennis Hastert Is Sentenced to 15 Months, and Apologizes for Sex Abuse". The New York Times. p. A1. Retrieved April 27, 2016.^ McCaffrey, Shannon. Will Bob Barr be the Ralph Nader of '08?, Associated Press (via CBS News), 22 June 2008.^ Baker, Russ. "Portrait of a political 'pit bull'", Salon, December 22, 1998.^ "Rep. Dan Burton – Member of Congress representing Indiana's 5th District", Library Factfiles, Indianapolis Star, updated January 2007. Retrieved February 25, 2007.^ "Gingrich Expects 'Republican Revolution'", news4jax.com, 28 October 2010.^ Schneider, Bill. "Gingrich confession: Clearing the way for a 2008 run?", CNN. March 9, 2007. Retrieved December 29, 2009.^ "Gingrich admits having affair in '90s". MSNBC. Associated Press. Retrieved June 7, 2009.^ "Sex Scandals Through the Years: Both Parties Even". Newsweek. 25 June 2009.^ Page, Susan (21 September 2009). "Secret interviews add insight to Clinton presidency". USA Today. Retrieved 21 September 2009.^ "Clinton: Lewinsky affair a 'terrible moral error'". CNN. 21 June 2004. Retrieved 9 May 2013.
Further readingEdit
Communication from Kenneth W. Starr, Independent Counsel, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Publishing Office, September 11, 1998
External linksEdit
 Wikimedia Commons has media related to Lewinsky scandal.A Chronology: Key Moments In The Clinton-Lewinsky Saga. CNN. (1998)"The Fallout". BBC Online in-depth coverage. (1999)A Guide to the Monica Lewinsky Story – The Coffee Shop Times (last updated July 8, 2001)[1] The Clinton/Lewinsky Story: How Accurate? How Fair? (2003)
Last edited 2 months ago by an anonymous user
RELATED ARTICLES
American whistleblower
Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted.

Crime Stories

10 Crime Stories With Strange Coincidences
ROBIN WARDER FEBRUARY 27, 2015
Pin5
SHARES690
A coincidence is defined as a series of events and circumstances which seemingly have no apparent connection to each other, but wind up being related by pure chance. Whenever a mysterious crime takes place, investigators will attempt to solve it by piecing together the events and circumstances surrounding the case. However, complications can ensue when a coincidence enters the picture. An investigation can be seriously hampered when one is forced to look into events which, at first glance, appear to be connected to the crime but turn out to be nothing more than a bizarre coincidence. In many of these cases, the coincidence had no direct connection to the crime but made for an interesting “story-within-a-story.”
10The Deaths Of Iqbal Al-Hilli And Her Secret Ex-Husband

On September 5, 2012, a shocking mass murder took place near Chevaline, France. A British tourist named Saad al-Hilli was traveling on a mountainside road with his wife, Iqbal, their two young daughters, Zainab and Zeena, and Iqbal’s elderly mother, Suhalia al-Allaf. Sometime that afternoon, their vehicle was ambushed near Lake Annency and riddled with bullets. Saad, Iqbal, and Suhalia were all shot to death. Zeena survived the attack by staying hidden, and Zainab was wounded but managed to pull through.
A French cyclist named Sylvain Mollier was also found dead at the scene, presumably at the wrong place at the wrong time. To this day, investigators have been unable to determine who was responsible, or what their motive might have been, and the shooting has been described as “the perfect crime.” If that wasn’t enough, the murders were also followed by an astonishing coincidence.
None of Iqbal’s family or friends knew this wasn’t her first marriage. In February 1999, Iqbal was working in the US and, in order to get a green card and remain in the country, she agreed to marry an oil worker named Jim Thompson. The marriage did not work out, and the couple split up the following year.
When Iqbal left the country, she eventually got remarried and started a family with Saad al-Hilli, but never told anybody about her previous marriage to Thompson. However, the marriage ceased to be a secret after a stunning turn of events. Mere hours after Iqbal al-Hilli’s murder, Jim Thompson suffered a fatal heart attack while driving through his hometown of Natchez, Mississippi. Naturally, there was some suspicion of foul play, but it appears that Thompson’s death had no connection to his ex-wife and was nothing more than an unfortunate coincidence.
9The Disappearances Of Stacy Peterson And Her Mother

One of the most sensational crime stories of recent years was the disappearance of 23-year-old Stacy Peterson. In 2007, Stacy lived in Bollingbrook, Illinois with her police officer husband, Drew Peterson, who was 30 years older and on his fourth marriage. On October 28, Stacy went missing, and since her marriage to Drew was troubled at the time, suspicion immediately turned to him.
Three years earlier, Drew’s third wife, Kathleen Savio, was found dead in her bathtub in what was initially believed to be an accidental drowning. Drew collected a substantial life insurance policy, but Stacy’s disappearance prompted another investigation into Kathleen’s death. In 2009, Drew was charged with his ex-wife’s murder and eventually sentenced to 38 years in prison. He remains the prime suspect in Stacy’s disappearance, but her body has never been found.
Stacy’s disappearance was just the latest in a long line of tragedies for her family. In an eerie confidence, Stacy’s 40-year-old mother, Christie Cales, had also vanished under suspicious circumstances nine years earlier. Christie had a total of six children but lost two of them during the 1980s when they were infants. Christie abused drugs and alcohol, was often in trouble with the law, and had a turbulent relationship with her husband.
The couple often neglected their children, but when they divorced in 1990, Christie’s husband got sole custody. In 1998, Christie was living with her boyfriend in Blue Island, Illinois. On March 11, she apparently walked out of her home and never returned, and that was the last anyone ever saw of her. Much like with Stacy, Christie’s family has always suspected that her spouse was responsible for her disappearance, but there wasn’t enough evidence to charge him. Officially, both Christie Cales and her daughter remain missing.
8The Murder Victim Who Succumbed To A Rare Blood Disease

In 1964, 33-year-old Calvin Jones was involved in a relationship with 23-year-old Sara Tolbert. On June 13, the Philadelphia couple got into a heated argument inside Jones’s vehicle and he responded by viciously beating his girlfriend with a rubber hose 15 times. Jones then spent the next several hours driving around with Tolbert’s body inside his car and, at some unspecified point, she died. Jones finally decided to drive to a police station and confess to murder.
He had previously spent time in prison for trying to poison his wife, so it seemed like his punishment would be severe. However, Jones would not face a murder charge when he went to court, as a remarkable set of circumstances would allow him to plead guilty to the lesser charge of aggravated assault and battery.
In a stunning coincidence, it turned out that even if she was not beaten by her boyfriend, Sara Tolbert still would have died the following morning. After a medical examination was done on Tolbert’s body, it was discovered that she was suffering from a very rare blood disease called sickle-cell anemia.
At the time Jones assaulted her, Tolbert only had hours to live before the disease became fatal. Two different medical examiners officially concluded that Tolbert died of natural causes, so it was impossible to prove that Jones’s beating played any role in her death. In the end, the judge agreed to accept Jones’s guilty plea to assault and battery but stated that the defendant would have been indicted for murder were it not for the unlikely coincidence.
7The Wrongful Conviction Of Dennis Maher

On the evening of November 16, 1983, a woman walking through Lowell, Massachusetts was attacked by a male assailant and raped. The following night, another woman was attacked by a man in the exact same area, but she managed to escape and provide a description to police. Later that evening, a resident named Dennis Maher was detained, and both victims positively identified him as their attacker.
Maher would be charged with the attacks and, after an unsolved rape from the previous summer was also pinned on him, he was sentenced to life in prison. Years later, he got in touch with The Innocence Project, an organization dedicated to helping wrongfully convicted people. They successfully lobbied for DNA testing on the evidence, and it excluded Maher as the perpetrator of the rapes. In 2003, he was released after serving 19 years in prison for crimes he didn’t commit.
Unfortunately for Maher, he had been railroaded because of an unbelievable series of coincidences. The second victim told police that her attacker wore a red hooded sweatshirt and military-style jacket and had threatened her with a knife. Later that night, while exiting a liquor store, Maher garnered a cop’s attention because he was wearing a red hooded sweatshirt. A military jacket and a knife were later found in Maher’s vehicle.
Given the circumstances, it seemed perfectly logical to believe Maher was the attacker, especially after the victims identified him. However, at the time, Maher was a sergeant in the United States Army, so it wasn’t unusual for him to have a military jacket and military knife in his vehicle. After DNA testing exonerated Maher, it became apparent the victims who identified him were mistaken, and that he was just a tragic victim of bad luck. The real perpetrator was never found.
6The Mary Morris Murders

On the morning of October 12, 2000, 48-year-old Mary Henderson Morris left her Houston home. Later that day, her burned car was found in a remote area with Mary’s torched body inside. Curiously, the victim’s wedding ring was missing. By all accounts, Mary was a loving wife and mother without any enemies, so no one could figure out why she was murdered in such a horrific fashion.
However, the case took a surprising turn three days later when a 39-year-old woman was found dead inside her car in the same vicinity. She had been beaten and shot with her own gun in a failed attempt to make her death look like suicide. The victim’s name: Mary McGinnis Morris.
Shortly before her death, Mary McGinnis Morris had made a frantic phone call to 911 while she was being attacked. Attention soon turned toward Mary’s husband, Mike Morris, who stood to collect a substantial life insurance policy from his wife’s death. While Mike had an alibi during the time of Mary’s murder, phone records showed that he made a four-minute call to Mary’s cell phone two hours after her frantic call to 911.
Mike claimed that no one answered the call, and that he let Mary’s phone ring for four straight minutes. This led to a theory that Mike hired someone to murder his wife but that they killed another person named Mary Morris by mistake. Mary Henderson Morris’s missing wedding ring may have been taken by a contract killer as proof that they completed the job. However, police have since leaned toward the position that the two Mary Morris murders are nothing than more than a bizarre coincidence and have no connection to each other. Nevertheless, they both remain unsolved.
5The Disappearances Of The Palmer Brothers

In missing person cases, it’s not uncommon for siblings or family members to disappear together. However, it’s extremely rare for two siblings to go missing at different times under completely different circumstances. In 1999, 15-year-old Michael Palmer lived in Wasilla, Alaska and was the youngest of three brothers. During the early morning hours of June 4, Michael and three friends left a graduation party on their bicycles, but Michael got so far behind that they lost sight of him.
When Michael never returned home, he was reported missing. Michael’s bicycle was later discovered in the Little Susitna River, and his wet, muddy sneakers were found 180 meters (600 ft) away. A search of the river turned up no trace of Michael’s body, and he has never been found.
Believe it or not, Michael’s older brother, Chucky, would also disappear under mysterious circumstances over a decade later. On April 13, 2010, 30-year-old Chucky was staying with friends and relatives at a cabin in the Talkeetna Mountains. That night, they decided to take a ride through the area on their snowmobiles. However, much like his younger brother, Chucky became separated from his group at some point and was never seen again.
His snowmobile was found the following day, but there was no sign of Chucky or any footprints in the area. Chris Palmer, the oldest sibling in the family, had stayed behind at the cabin the night Chucky disappeared. He now had to go through the ordeal of searching for a missing younger brother—for the second time in 11 years—and coming up empty.
4Couple Reports Murder Before Being Charged With Unrelated Murder

Shortly after midnight on July 3, 1991, 21-year-old Kirsten Davis was finishing up a trip from her hometown of Boulder, Colorado to visit a friend in Vidalia, Georgia. Davis was approximately 8 kilometers (5 mi) away from her destination when another vehicle pulled up alongside her station wagon. Someone from the vehicle pulled out a shotgun and fired it at Davis’s head. She was killed instantly, and her car overturned on the side of the road.
Shortly after, a young married couple named Tracy and Karen Wilkes happened upon Davis’s overturned car and reported her murder to the police. In a strange coincidence, the couple would soon find themselves embroiled in another murder in the area—which they themselves committed.
About 45 days after the Davis murder, Tracy and Karen Wilkes burglarized and burned down the Treutlen County home of 69-year-old Moril V. Hudson, shooting him three times in the head. The couple attempted to flee the area and escape to Alabama. When Tracy decided to return home to retrieve some items, he was subsequently arrested. Shortly thereafter, Karen was found living in a trailer in Alabama and had the murder weapon in her possession.
On August 23, they were both formally charged with murder, burglary, and arson. Naturally, authorities started to suspect that the couple who found Kirsten Davis’s body were actually responsible for her murder. However, they both passed polygraph tests, and there is no evidence they committed the crime. Tracy and Karen pleaded guilty to the Hudson murder and went to prison, but Kirsten Davis’s senseless—and seemingly random—murder is still unsolved.
3The Lucia De Berk Trial

One of the most sensational murder cases in the history of the Netherlands was the trial of Lucia de Berk, where the very concept of coincidence was introduced as evidence. De Berk worked as a pediatric nurse at three different hospitals in The Hague. On September 4, 2001, De Berk was present when an infant girl died at the Juliana Children’s Hospital. Her co-workers soon expressed concern after noticing a pattern: De Berk just happened to be on duty during a large number of deaths and resuscitations at the hospital, most of them involving infants.
After an investigation, the hospital concluded that these deaths were unnatural and decided to press charges against De Berk. On March 24, 2003, she was sentenced to life imprisonment on four counts of murder and three counts of attempted murder.
Since there was no physical evidence against De Berk, or any witnesses to her crimes, statistics were used as the linchpin of the prosecution’s case. They claimed that De Berk’s presence in the hospital when all these deaths took place could not be coincidental. An expert testified that the odds of it being a coincidence were 1 in 342 million. However, De Berk had numerous supporters who believed she was the victim of a miscarriage of justice, and appealed her conviction.
They sought to debunk the statistics from De Berk’s trial, which had been presented by an unqualified law professor. A professor of mathematical statistics argued that the odds of all these deaths being a coincidence were 1 in 48. The case was heard in front of the Supreme Court of the Netherlands, which agreed that the statistical evidence was flawed and granted a new trial. A new investigation concluded that De Berk’s alleged murders were likely natural deaths. In April 2010, she received a not guilty verdict and was exonerated.
2The Liquid Matthew Case

On December 6, 1983, an unidentified Hispanic man was found strangled to death in a vacant lot in Hialeah, Florida. For a brief period, this baffling murder became known as the “Liquid Matthew Case” because of a series of bizarre notes discovered at the scene. A plastic bag was found taped behind a nearby “no dumping” sign containing a note with some strange poetry. It read: “Now the motive is clear and the victim is too. You’ve got all the answers. Just follow the clues.” The poetry also contained a riddle which led police to the next clue: Another poem was taped behind a speed limit sign. This poem contained the cryptic verses: “Yes, Matthew is dead, but his body not felt. Those brains were not Matt’s because his body did melt. For Billy threw Matthew in some hot boiling oil. To confuse the police for the mystery they did toil.”
However, there soon turned out to be an innocent explanation for this confusing mystery. On Halloween, four local churches had organized an elaborate murder mystery game where the participants concocted fictitious crimes and hid cryptic clues throughout the area. The strange poetry was all part of this murder mystery game. Since it wound up raining on the night the game took place, the notes were never retrieved and remained there for over a month. In a macabre coincidence, a real murder victim was found in the exact same area, but his death ultimately had no connection to the cryptic poetry whatsoever. In the end, the victim was identified as a Colombian seaman named Francisco Patino Gutierrez, and his murder was believed to be related to drug smuggling.
1The Trunk Murders

During one seven-year period, the town of Brighton, England had two unrelated murders in which female victims were dismembered and found inside trunks. There were also two similar murders nearby. In 1927, a trunk containing the body of a dismembered woman named Minnie Boniati was found at Charing Cross Station in London. Her killer, John Robinson, was soon charged with the murder and hanged.
Seven years later, two trunk murders took place within one month of each other. On June 17, 1934, an unclaimed trunk was discovered at Brighton Railway Station containing the dismembered torso of a young woman. Her head, arms, and legs were missing but, one day later, a suitcase containing the legs was found at another railway station. The victim was five months pregnant, but there was no indication about who she was. To this day, the identity of the woman and her killer remains unknown.
In an attempt to solve the murder, police started searching through residences in the area. Incredibly, they would find a trunk containing another dismembered woman. The decomposing victim was identified as a 42-year-old prostitute named Violette Kaye, who had been missing since May. When Kaye disappeared, her boyfriend Tony Mancini told everyone she left for Paris. The trunk containing Kaye’s body was found inside Mancini’s flat, and he was arrested and charged with her murder. At trial, Mancini’s defense team argued that Kaye had been killed by someone else.
When Mancini found her, he was worried about being accused of the murder, so he decided to dismember her body and hide it inside a trunk. Believe it or not, the jury bought Mancini’s story and acquitted him. In 1976, Mancini finally confessed to Kaye’s murder, but he could not be tried for the crime again. In spite of their similarities, the two Brighton trunk murders were determined to be unrelated.
Robin Warder is a budding Canadian screenwriter who has used his encyclopedic movie knowledge to publish numerous articles at Cracked.com. He is also the co-owner of a pop culture website called The Back Row and recently worked on a sci-fi short film called Jet Ranger of Another Tomorrow. Feel free to contact him here.

Saturday, July 1, 2017

Intellectual people don't mint گونگی چیخ

intellectua peopLe dn't mind bu'T urGent reeaadinG__
گونگی_چیخ
یونیورسٹی کے ایک دوست نے بتایا کہ ان کے کزن سے ایک غلطی سرزد ہوئی ہے لڑکی سے زنا کے ارتکاب کے بعدوہ لڑکی پیٹ سے ہے وہ چاہتے ہیں میں بچہ گرانے میں اور جیسے کہ اُنہوں نے کہا لڑکی کی زندگی بچانے میں انکی مدد کروں مجھے یاد آیا کچھ عرصہ پہلے گونگی چیخ کا زکر زبان زد عام تھا اور میں اپنے دوست کے ساتھ ساتھ باقی لوگو کو بھی اس واقعے سے آگاہ کرنا چاہوں گا ۔۔۔
ﺍﻣﺮﯾﮑﮧ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺳﻦ 1984 ﻣﯿﮟ ﺍﯾﮏ ﮐﺎﻧﻔﺮﻧﺲ ﮨﻮﺋﯽ ﺗﮭﯽ ‘ – ﻧﯿﺸﻨﻞ ﺭﺍﺋﭩﺲ ﭨﻮ ﻻﻳﭙﮫ ﻛﻨﻮﯾﻨﺸﻦ .‘ ﺍﺱ ﮐﺎﻧﻔﺮﻧﺲ ﮐﮯ ﺍﯾﮏ ﻧﻤﺎﺋﻨﺪﮮ ﻧﮯ ﮈﺍﮐﭩﺮ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﺭﮈ ﻧﮯﺗﮭﯿﻨﺴﻦ ﮐﮯ ﮐﯽ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺳﮯ ﺍﺳﻘﺎﻁ ﺣﻤﻞ ﮐﯽ ﺑﻨﺎﺋﯽ ﮔﺌﯽ ﺍﯾﮏ ﺍﻟﭩﺮﺍﺳﺎﮈ ﻓﻠﻢ ‘ﺳﺎﻟﭧ ﺳﻜﺮﻳﻢ )‘ﮔﻮﻧﮕﯽ ﭼﯿﺦ ( ﮐﺎ ﺟﻮ ﺗﻔﺼﯿﻼﺕ ﺩﯾﺎ ﺗﮭﺎ،
ﻭﮦ ﺍﺱ ﻃﺮﺡ ﮨﮯ‘ -ﺑﭽﮧ ﺩﺍﻧﯽ ﮐﯽ ﻭﮦ ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻡ ﺑﭽﯽ ﺍﺏ 15 ﮨﻔﺘﮯ ﮐﯽ ﺗﮭﯽ ﺍﻭﺭ ﮐﺎﻓﯽ ﭼﺴﺖ ﺗﮭﯽ . ﮨﻢ ﺍﺳﮯ ﺍﭘﻨﯽ ﻣﺎﮞ ﮐﯽ ﭘﯿﭧ ﻣﯿﮟ ﮐﮭﯿﻠﺘﮯ، ﮐﺮﻭﭦ ﺑﺪﻟﺘﮯ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺍﻧﮕﻮﭨﮭﺎ ﭼﻮﺳﺘﮯ ﮨﻮﺋﮯ ﺩﯾﮑﮫ ﺭﮨﮯ ﺗﮭﮯ. ﺍﺱ ﮐﮯ ﺩﻝ ﮐﯽ ﺩﮬﮍﻛﻨﻮﮞ ﮐﻮ ﺑﮭﯽ ﮨﻢ ﺩﯾﮑﮫ ﭘﺎ ﺭﮨﮯ ﺗﮭﮯ ﺍﻭﺭ ﻭﮦ ﺍﺱ ﻭﻗﺖ 120 ﮐﯽ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﮯ ﺩﮬﮍﮎ ﺭﮨﺎ ﺗﮭﺎ.
ﺳﺐ ﮐﭽﮫ ﺑﺎﻟﮑﻞ ﻧﺎﺭﻣﻞ ﺗﮭﺎ؛ ﻟﯿﮑﻦ ﺟﯿﺴﮯ ﮨﯽ ﭘﮩﻠﮯ ﺍﻭﺯﺍﺭ )ﺳﻜﺴﻦ ﭘﻤﭗ( ﻧﮯ ﺑﭽﮧ ﺩﺍﻧﯽ ﮐﯽ ﺩﯾﻮﺍﺭ ﮐﻮ ﭼﮭﻮ ﻟﯿﺎ، ﻭﮦ ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻡ ﺑﭽﯽ ﮈﺭ ﺳﮯ ﺍﯾﮏ ﺩﻡ ﮔﮭﻮﻡ ﮐﺮ ﺳﮑﮍ ﮔﺌﯽ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺍﺱ ﮐﮯ ﺩﻝ ﮐﯽ ﺩﮬﮍﮐﻦ ﺑﮩﺖ ﺑﮍﮪ ﮔﺌﯽ . ﺍﮔﺮﭼﮧ ﺍﺑﮭﯽ ﺗﮏ ﮐﺴﯽ ﺍﻭﺯﺍﺭ ﻧﮯ ﺑﭽﯽ ﮐﻮ ﭼﮭﻮﺍ ﺗﮏ ﺑﮭﯽ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ ﺗﮭﺎ، ﻟﯿﮑﻦ ﺍﺳﮯ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﮧ ﮨﻮ ﮔﯿﺎ ﺗﮭﺎ ﮐﮧ ﮐﻮﺋﯽ ﭼﯿﺰ ﺍﺱ ﮐﮯ ﺍﺭﺍﻣﮕﺎﻩ، ﺍﺱ ﻣﺤﻔﻮﻅ ﻋﻼﻗﮯ ﭘﺮ ﺣﻤﻠﮧ ﮐﺮﻧﮯ ﮐﯽ ﮐﻮﺷﺶ ﮐﺮ ﺭﮨﯽ ﮨﮯ.
ﮨﻢ ﺩﮨﺸﺖ ﺳﮯ ﺑﮭﺮﮮ ﯾﮧ ﺩﯾﮑﮫ ﺭﮨﮯ ﺗﮭﮯ ﮐﮧ ﮐﺲ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻭﮦ ﺍﻭﺯﺍﺭ ﺍﺱ ﻧﻨﮭﯽ- ﻣﻨﯽ ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻡ ﮔﮍﻳﺎ- ﺳﯽ ﺑﭽﯽ ﮐﮯ ﭨﮑﮍﮮ ﭨﮑﮍﮮ ﮐﺮ ﺭﮨﯽ ﺗﮭﯽ . ﭘﮩﻠﮯ ﮐﻤﺮ، ﭘﮭﺮ ﭘﯿﺮ ﻭﻏﯿﺮﮦ ﮐﮯ ﭨﮑﮍﮮ ﺍﯾﺴﮯ ﮐﺎﭨﮯ ﺟﺎ ﺭﮨﮯ ﺗﮭﮯ ﺟﯿﺴﮯ ﻭﮦ ﺯﻧﺪﮦ ﻣﺨﻠﻮﻕ ﻧﮧ ﮨﻮﮐﺮ ﮐﻮﺋﯽ ﮔﺎﺟﺮ- ﻣﻮﻟﯽ ﮨﻮ
ﺍﻭﺭ ﻭﮦ ﺑﭽﯽ ﺩﺭﺩ ﺳﮯ ﭼﮭﭩﭙﭩﺎﺗﯽ ﮨﻮﺋﯽ، ﺳﮑﮍ ﮐﺮ ﮔﮭﻮﻡ ﮔﮭﻮﻡ ﮐﺮ ﺗﮍﭘﺘﯽ ﮨﻮﺋﯽ ﺍﺱ ﻗﺎﺗﻞ ﺍﻭﺯﺍﺭ ﺳﮯ ﺑﭽﻨﮯ ﮐﯽ ﮐﻮﺷﺶ ﮐﺮ ﺭﮨﯽ ﺗﮭﯽ. ﻭﮦ ﺍﺱ ﺑﺮﯼ ﻃﺮﺡ ﮈﺭ ﮔﺌﯽ ﺗﮭﯽ
ﮐﮧ ﺍﯾﮏ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﺱ ﮐﮯ ﺩﻝ ﮐﯽ ﺩﮬﮍﮐﻦ 200 ﺗﮏ ﭘﮩﻨﭻ ﮔﺌﯽ! ﻣﯿﮟ ﻧﮯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﭘﻨﯽ ﺁﻧﮑﮭﻮﮞ ﺳﮯ ﺍﺱ ﮐﻮ ﺍﭘﻨﺎ ﺳﺮ ﭘﯿﭽﮭﮯ ﺟﮭﭩﻜﺘﮯ ﻭ ﻣﻨﮧ ﮐﮭﻮﻝ ﮐﺮ ﭼﻴﻜﮭﻨﮯ ﮐﻮﺷﺶ ﮐﺮﺗﮯ ﮨﻮﺋﮯ ﺩﯾﮑﮭﺎ،
ﺟﺴﮯ ﮈﺍﮐﭩﺮ ﻧﮯﺗﮭﯿﻨﺴﻦ میں ‘ﮔﻮﻧﮕﯽ ﭼﯿﺦ’ ﯾﺎ ‘ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺵ ﭘﮑﺎﺭ’ ﮐﮩﺎ ﮨﮯ.
ﺁﺧﺮ ﻣﯿﮟ ﮨﻢ ﻧﮯ ﻭﮦ ﻧﺮﺷﺲ ﻭﻳﺒﮭﺘﺲ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺑﮭﯽ ﺩﯾﮑﮭﺎ، ﺟﺐ ﺳﮉﺳﯽ ﺍﺱ ﮐﮭﻮﭘﮍﯼ ﮐﻮ ﺗﻮﮌﻧﮯ ﮐﮯ ﻟﺌﮯ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺭﮨﯽ ﺗﮭﯽ ﺍﻭﺭ ﭘﮭﺮ ﺩﺑﺎﻧﮯ ﺳﮯ ﺍﺱ ﺳﺨﺖ ﮐﮭﻮﭘﮍﯼ ﮐﻮ ﺗﻮﮌ ﺭﮨﯽ ﺗﮭﯽ
ﮐﯿﻮﻧﮑﮧ ﺳﺮ ﮐﺎ ﻭﮦ ﺣﺼﮧ ﺑﻐﯿﺮ ﺗﻮﮌﮮ ﺳﮑﺸﻦ ﭨﯿﻮﺏ ﮐﮯ ﺫﺭﯾﻌﮯ ﺑﺎﮨﺮ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ ﻧﮑﺎﻻ ﺟﺎ ﺳﮑﺘﺎ ﺗﮭﺎ‘ .
ﻗﺘﻞ ﮐﮯ ﺍﺱ ﺍﺩﺑﮭﺖ ﮐﮭﯿﻞ ﮐﻮ ﺧﻮﺷﺤﺎﻝ ﮐﺮﻧﮯ ﻣﯿﮟ ﻗﺮﯾﺐ ﭘﻨﺪﺭﮦ ﻣﻨﭧ ﮐﺎ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻟﮕﺎ
ﺍﻭﺭ ﺍﺱ ﺩﺭﺩﻧﺎﮎ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﮐﺎ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﮦ ﺍﺱ ﺳﮯ ﺯﯾﺎﺩﮦ ﺍﻭﺭ ﮐﺲ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻟﮕﺎﯾﺎ ﺟﺎ ﺳﮑﺘﺎ ﮨﮯ ﮐﮧ ﺟﺲ ﮈﺍﮐﭩﺮ ﻧﮯ ﯾﮧ ﺍﺳﻘﺎﻁ ﺣﻤﻞ ﮐﯿﺎ ﺗﮭﺎ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺟﺲ ﻧﮯ ﻣﺤﺾ ﻛﻮﺗﻮﻫﻠﻮﺵ ﺍﺱ ﻓﻠﻢ ﺑﻨﻮﺍ ﻟﯽ ﺗﮭﯽ، ﺍﺱ ﻧﮯ ﺟﺐ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺱ ﻓﻠﻢ ﮐﻮ ﺩﯾﮑﮭﺎ ﺗﻮ ﻭﮦ ﺍﭘﻨﺎ ﮐﻠﯿﻨﮏ ﭼﮭﻮﮌ ﮐﺮ ﭼﻼ ﮔﯿﺎ ﺍﻭﺭ ﭘﮭﺮ ﻭﺍﭘﺲ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ ﺁﯾﺎ
میرے لیے چیونٹی مارنا بھی مشکل ہے تم نے ماں کے کوکھ میں پلنے والے بچے کی بات کی .....!!

MCM 304 MASS MEDIAN IN PAKISTAN ASSIGNMENT NO 2

MASS MEDIA IN PAKISTAN (MCM-304) Assignment No 2 Marks: 15 Q. 1     Women Magazines focus on the interests of women and the...